Make vs Power Automate

Make and Power Automate are both automation options. Make lists 5 features across 1 platform; Power Automate lists 8 features across 2 platforms — see the full breakdown below, sourced from each vendor's own site rather than ratings or reviews.

Side-by-side summary

ComparingMakePower Automate
CategoryAutomationAutomation
Alternatives tracked34
PlatformsWebWeb, Windows
Pricing modelFree + paid plansPaid plans

Best for Make

Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.

Best for Power Automate

Organizations already invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that need to automate both cloud app workflows and legacy desktop processes with a single low-code platform.

Feature comparison

Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.

Make

  • Thousands of pre-built app integrations
  • Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
  • AI agent creation and deployment
  • Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
  • Centralized management of automations across an organization

Power Automate

  • Cloud flows for connecting apps and services (DPA)
  • Desktop flows for attended and unattended RPA on legacy systems
  • Copilot for natural-language flow creation and editing
  • AI Builder for document and image processing
  • 1,400+ prebuilt, certified connectors including native Microsoft 365 integration
  • Process mining and task mining to discover automation opportunities
  • Managed Environments with governance and data-loss-prevention controls
  • Mobile browser access to the Power Automate portal; approvals remain available through Microsoft Teams and Outlook after the standalone mobile app deprecation

Pros and cons

Make

Pros
  • Thousands of pre-built app integrations
  • Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
  • AI agent creation and deployment
  • Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
  • Centralized management of automations across an organization
Cons
  • The Free plan is capped at 1,000 credits per month, so higher-volume automation requires a paid credit allowance.
  • The displayed Core, Pro, and Teams prices assume annual billing and the same 10,000-credit monthly allowance used for the published examples.

Power Automate

Pros
  • Cloud flows for connecting apps and services (DPA)
  • Desktop flows for attended and unattended RPA on legacy systems
  • Copilot for natural-language flow creation and editing
  • AI Builder for document and image processing
  • 1,400+ prebuilt, certified connectors including native Microsoft 365 integration
  • Process mining and task mining to discover automation opportunities
  • Managed Environments with governance and data-loss-prevention controls
  • Mobile browser access to the Power Automate portal; approvals remain available through Microsoft Teams and Outlook after the standalone mobile app deprecation
Cons
  • There is a 30-day trial but no permanent standalone free Power Automate plan on the current pricing page.
  • Licensing differs by user, bot, hosted bot, and add-on; unattended scenarios can also require additional licenses for the software being automated, and flows remain subject to service/action limits.

Key differences

  • Make lists Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, Option to build via code or natural-language prompt, Centralized management of automations across an organization that Power Automate doesn't list.
  • Power Automate lists Cloud flows for connecting apps and services (DPA), Desktop flows for attended and unattended RPA on legacy systems, Copilot for natural-language flow creation and editing, AI Builder for document and image processing, 1,400+ prebuilt, certified connectors including native Microsoft 365 integration, Process mining and task mining to discover automation opportunities, Managed Environments with governance and data-loss-prevention controls, Mobile browser access to the Power Automate portal; approvals remain available through Microsoft Teams and Outlook after the standalone mobile app deprecation that Make doesn't list.
  • Power Automate supports Windows, which Make doesn't list.

Choose Make if…

Choose Make if this fits: Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises. Compared with Power Automate specifically, Make also offers Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, and 2 more features that Power Automate doesn't list.

Choose Power Automate if…

Choose Power Automate if this fits: Organizations already invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that need to automate both cloud app workflows and legacy desktop processes with a single low-code platform. Compared with Make specifically, Power Automate also offers Cloud flows for connecting apps and services (DPA), Desktop flows for attended and unattended RPA on legacy systems, Copilot for natural-language flow creation and editing, and 5 more features that Make doesn't list, plus Windows support that Make doesn't list.

Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.

Keep exploring

Related software

Keep exploring

Related comparisons

Still not sure which one fits?

Answer a few questions and get a deterministic, explained match instead of comparing tool by tool.

Find my software

Comparing something else?

Search any software by name to see its alternatives.