Make vs n8n

Make and n8n are both automation options. Here's how they compare on official platforms, features, and positioning — sourced from each vendor's own site, not from ratings or reviews.

Side-by-side summary

ComparingMaken8n

CategoryAutomationAutomation

Alternatives tracked22

PlatformsNot yet documentedWeb (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes

Best for Make

Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.

Best for n8n

Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting.

Feature comparison

Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.

Make

Thousands of pre-built app integrations
Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
AI agent creation and deployment
Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
Centralized management of automations across an organization

n8n

Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
Human-in-the-loop approval steps
Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment

Pros and cons

Make

Pros

Thousands of pre-built app integrations
Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
AI agent creation and deployment
Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
Centralized management of automations across an organization

Cons

We don't publish a "cons" list for either product. No vendor's official site documents its own product's weaknesses, so there's no sourced basis for one — and we'd rather say that plainly than invent one.

n8n

Pros

Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
Human-in-the-loop approval steps
Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment

Cons

Key differences

Make lists Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, Option to build via code or natural-language prompt, Centralized management of automations across an organization that n8n doesn't list.
n8n lists Visual workflow builder with inline custom code, Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections, AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support, Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning, Human-in-the-loop approval steps, Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment that Make doesn't list.
n8n supports Web (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes, which Make doesn't list.

Choose Make if…

Choose Make if this fits: Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.

Choose n8n if…

Choose n8n if this fits: Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting.

Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.