Make vs n8n

Make and n8n are both automation options. Make lists 5 features across 1 platform; n8n lists 6 features across 2 platforms — see the full breakdown below, sourced from each vendor's own site rather than ratings or reviews.

Side-by-side summary

ComparingMaken8n

CategoryAutomationAutomation

Alternatives tracked33

PlatformsWebWeb (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes

Pricing modelFree + paid plansFree + paid plans

Best for Make

Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.

Best for n8n

Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting.

Feature comparison

Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.

Make

Thousands of pre-built app integrations
Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
AI agent creation and deployment
Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
Centralized management of automations across an organization

n8n

Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
Human-in-the-loop approval steps
Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment

Pros and cons

Make

Pros

Thousands of pre-built app integrations
Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
AI agent creation and deployment
Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
Centralized management of automations across an organization

Cons

We don't infer weaknesses from missing or differently worded vendor marketing copy. Use documented plan limits, migration requirements, and other sourced constraints as decision inputs; anything not supported by a source remains unverified.

n8n

Pros

Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
Human-in-the-loop approval steps
Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment

Cons

Key differences

Make lists Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, Option to build via code or natural-language prompt, Centralized management of automations across an organization that n8n doesn't list.
n8n lists Visual workflow builder with inline custom code, Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections, AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support, Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning, Human-in-the-loop approval steps, Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment that Make doesn't list.
Make supports Web, which n8n doesn't list.
n8n supports Web (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes, which Make doesn't list.

Choose Make if…

Choose Make if this fits: Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.

Visit Make

Choose n8n if…

Choose n8n if this fits: Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting.

Visit n8n

Explore the n8n alternatives decision guide

Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.