Make vs n8n
Make and n8n are both automation options. Make lists 5 features across 1 platform; n8n lists 6 features across 2 platforms — see the full breakdown below, sourced from each vendor's own site rather than ratings or reviews.
Side-by-side summary
Best for Make
Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises.
Best for n8n
Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting.
Feature comparison
Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.
Make
- Thousands of pre-built app integrations
- Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
- AI agent creation and deployment
- Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
- Centralized management of automations across an organization
n8n
- Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
- Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
- AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
- Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
- Human-in-the-loop approval steps
- Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment
Pros and cons
Make
- Thousands of pre-built app integrations
- Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder
- AI agent creation and deployment
- Option to build via code or natural-language prompt
- Centralized management of automations across an organization
- The Free plan is capped at 1,000 credits per month, so higher-volume automation requires a paid credit allowance.
- The displayed Core, Pro, and Teams prices assume annual billing and the same 10,000-credit monthly allowance used for the published examples.
n8n
- Visual workflow builder with inline custom code
- Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections
- AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support
- Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning
- Human-in-the-loop approval steps
- Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment
- The free Community Edition is self-hosted, so infrastructure, maintenance, backups, and production operations are the user's responsibility.
- Hosted Starter is limited to 2,500 workflow executions and Pro to 10,000; higher execution needs move to more expensive plans or custom Enterprise terms.
Key differences
- Make lists Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, Option to build via code or natural-language prompt, Centralized management of automations across an organization that n8n doesn't list.
- n8n lists Visual workflow builder with inline custom code, Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections, AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support, Step-by-step traceability of agent reasoning, Human-in-the-loop approval steps, Enterprise controls: SSO/SAML, audit logs, RBAC, Git-based deployment that Make doesn't list.
- Make supports Web, which n8n doesn't list.
- n8n supports Web (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes, which Make doesn't list.
Choose Make if…
Choose Make if this fits: Positioned for teams across many departments — marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR — in organizations ranging from smaller teams to large enterprises. Compared with n8n specifically, Make also offers Thousands of pre-built app integrations, Drag-and-drop visual scenario builder, AI agent creation and deployment, and 2 more features that n8n doesn't list, plus Web support that n8n doesn't list.
Choose n8n if…
Choose n8n if this fits: Positioned for technical teams — IT Ops, Security Operations, DevOps, and Sales — who want to automate processes while retaining full visibility and control, including via self-hosting. Compared with Make specifically, n8n also offers Visual workflow builder with inline custom code, Hundreds of pre-built app integrations plus custom API connections, AI agent building with multi-agent setups and RAG support, and 3 more features that Make doesn't list, plus Web (n8n.cloud), Self-hosted via Docker, npm, or Kubernetes support that Make doesn't list.
Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.
Keep exploring
Related software
Automation
IFTTT
IFTTT is a no-code automation platform that connects apps, services, and smart devices through simple trigger-and-action workflows called Applets.
Automation
Pipedream
Pipedream is a developer-focused integration and automation platform for building workflows that connect APIs, AI, and databases with code-level control when needed.
Automation
Tray.ai
Tray.ai (the Tray Platform) is an enterprise orchestration platform that unifies data integration, workflow automation, and AI agent development with governed MCP tooling.
Keep exploring
Related comparisons
Still not sure which one fits?
Answer a few questions and get a deterministic, explained match instead of comparing tool by tool.
Comparing something else?
Search any software by name to see its alternatives.