Hotjar vs Matomo
Hotjar and Matomo are both analytics options. Hotjar lists 6 features across 1 platform; Matomo lists 6 features across 3 platforms — see the full breakdown below, sourced from each vendor's own site rather than ratings or reviews.
Side-by-side summary
Best for Hotjar
Best suited to existing Hotjar users planning the transition and to teams evaluating behavior analytics, session replay, heatmaps, funnels, surveys, and experience insights in the current Contentsquare product suite.
Best for Matomo
Positioned for organizations wanting privacy-compliant analytics without vendor lock-in — enterprises prioritizing data ownership, public sector bodies with regulatory requirements, and teams seeking a Google Analytics alternative.
Feature comparison
Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.
Hotjar
- Heatmaps and zone-based behavior analysis
- Session replay
- Funnels and journey analysis
- Surveys and feedback workflows
- Error and performance monitoring
- Sense AI features and LLM/MCP connectivity on current Contentsquare plans
Matomo
- Unsampled data with no sampling limitations
- Cookieless tracking and data anonymization options
- Self-hosted or cloud deployment with full data ownership
- Heatmaps and session recordings
- A/B testing and personalization
- Funnel/flow analysis and raw data export
Pros and cons
Hotjar
- Heatmaps and zone-based behavior analysis
- Session replay
- Funnels and journey analysis
- Surveys and feedback workflows
- Error and performance monitoring
- Sense AI features and LLM/MCP connectivity on current Contentsquare plans
- New users cannot create a Hotjar account; they are directed to Contentsquare instead.
- The old Hotjar plan names and prices are no longer the right basis for a new purchase decision.
- Contentsquare pricing is product-specific: Experience Analytics Growth starts at $49/month billed annually, while other products such as Voice of Customer have separate plan pricing.
Matomo
- Unsampled data with no sampling limitations
- Cookieless tracking and data anonymization options
- Self-hosted or cloud deployment with full data ownership
- Heatmaps and session recordings
- A/B testing and personalization
- Funnel/flow analysis and raw data export
- The free On-Premise edition requires you to provide and maintain the server, database, updates, backups, and operational security yourself.
- Matomo Cloud pricing scales with traffic, while advanced On-Premise capabilities and professional support can require paid bundles or separate subscriptions.
Key differences
- Hotjar lists Heatmaps and zone-based behavior analysis, Session replay, Funnels and journey analysis, Surveys and feedback workflows, Error and performance monitoring, Sense AI features and LLM/MCP connectivity on current Contentsquare plans that Matomo doesn't list.
- Matomo lists Unsampled data with no sampling limitations, Cookieless tracking and data anonymization options, Self-hosted or cloud deployment with full data ownership, Heatmaps and session recordings, A/B testing and personalization, Funnel/flow analysis and raw data export that Hotjar doesn't list.
- Matomo supports iOS, Android, which Hotjar doesn't list.
Choose Hotjar if…
Choose Hotjar if this fits: Best suited to existing Hotjar users planning the transition and to teams evaluating behavior analytics, session replay, heatmaps, funnels, surveys, and experience insights in the current Contentsquare product suite. Compared with Matomo specifically, Hotjar also offers Heatmaps and zone-based behavior analysis, Session replay, Funnels and journey analysis, and 3 more features that Matomo doesn't list.
Choose Matomo if…
Choose Matomo if this fits: Positioned for organizations wanting privacy-compliant analytics without vendor lock-in — enterprises prioritizing data ownership, public sector bodies with regulatory requirements, and teams seeking a Google Analytics alternative. Compared with Hotjar specifically, Matomo also offers Unsampled data with no sampling limitations, Cookieless tracking and data anonymization options, Self-hosted or cloud deployment with full data ownership, and 3 more features that Hotjar doesn't list, plus iOS, Android support that Hotjar doesn't list.
Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.
Keep exploring
Related software
Analytics
Amplitude
Amplitude positions itself as bringing "AI into every step of building self-improving products," combining product analytics, feedback, experimentation, and feature management.
Analytics
Google Analytics
Google Analytics measures user activity across websites and apps, with a free Standard service level and a paid Analytics 360 service level that raises data, reporting, retention, and export limits.
Analytics
Mixpanel
Mixpanel describes itself as "the product intelligence platform for the AI era," combining analytics, session replay, experiments, feature flags, and AI-powered insights.
Keep exploring
Related comparisons
Still not sure which one fits?
Answer a few questions and get a deterministic, explained match instead of comparing tool by tool.
Comparing something else?
Search any software by name to see its alternatives.