Joomla vs Umbraco
Joomla and Umbraco are both CMS options. Joomla lists 7 features across 2 platforms; Umbraco lists 8 features across 2 platforms — see the full breakdown below, sourced from each vendor's own site rather than ratings or reviews.
Side-by-side summary
Best for Joomla
Organizations that need multilingual websites, granular user permissions, and full design customization without licensing costs.
Best for Umbraco
.NET development teams and editors who want an open-source, editor-friendly CMS built on the latest .NET technology.
Feature comparison
Every feature listed here comes directly from each vendor's own official site.
Joomla
- Built-in multi-language support for content and interface
- Multi-user permission levels and access control groups
- 10,000+ free extensions and templates
- Fully extensible developer framework for custom builds
- Search-engine-optimized, mobile-responsive output
- Unlimited design customization through templates
- Completely free and open source with no vendor lock-in
Umbraco
- Content modeling with schema definition and property editor configuration
- Editor-friendly publishing workflows and user management
- Integrated media management system
- Multilingual and localization configuration for international sites
- Extensible backoffice with server-side customization and package building
- Frontend developer APIs for headless and coupled integrations
- Built on the latest .NET technology
- Umbraco Cloud managed hosting option
Pros and cons
Joomla
- Built-in multi-language support for content and interface
- Multi-user permission levels and access control groups
- 10,000+ free extensions and templates
- Fully extensible developer framework for custom builds
- Search-engine-optimized, mobile-responsive output
- Unlimited design customization through templates
- Completely free and open source with no vendor lock-in
We don't infer weaknesses from missing or differently worded vendor marketing copy. Use documented plan limits, migration requirements, and other sourced constraints as decision inputs; anything not supported by a source remains unverified.
Umbraco
- Content modeling with schema definition and property editor configuration
- Editor-friendly publishing workflows and user management
- Integrated media management system
- Multilingual and localization configuration for international sites
- Extensible backoffice with server-side customization and package building
- Frontend developer APIs for headless and coupled integrations
- Built on the latest .NET technology
- Umbraco Cloud managed hosting option
- The open-source Umbraco CMS core is free, but self-hosting infrastructure and optional commercial add-ons are separate costs.
- Managed Cloud features such as multiple environments, SLA coverage, and business-hours support require progressively higher-priced plans.
Key differences
- Joomla lists Built-in multi-language support for content and interface, Multi-user permission levels and access control groups, 10,000+ free extensions and templates, Fully extensible developer framework for custom builds, Search-engine-optimized, mobile-responsive output, Unlimited design customization through templates, Completely free and open source with no vendor lock-in that Umbraco doesn't list.
- Umbraco lists Content modeling with schema definition and property editor configuration, Editor-friendly publishing workflows and user management, Integrated media management system, Multilingual and localization configuration for international sites, Extensible backoffice with server-side customization and package building, Frontend developer APIs for headless and coupled integrations, Built on the latest .NET technology, Umbraco Cloud managed hosting option that Joomla doesn't list.
Choose Joomla if…
Choose Joomla if this fits: Organizations that need multilingual websites, granular user permissions, and full design customization without licensing costs. Compared with Umbraco specifically, Joomla also offers Built-in multi-language support for content and interface, Multi-user permission levels and access control groups, 10,000+ free extensions and templates, and 4 more features that Umbraco doesn't list.
Choose Umbraco if…
Choose Umbraco if this fits: .NET development teams and editors who want an open-source, editor-friendly CMS built on the latest .NET technology. Compared with Joomla specifically, Umbraco also offers Content modeling with schema definition and property editor configuration, Editor-friendly publishing workflows and user management, Integrated media management system, and 5 more features that Joomla doesn't list.
Facts on this page are sourced from each vendor's official site (linked below), not from ratings or reviews. Products change — verify anything that matters to your decision directly on the vendor's own site before switching. See our Disclaimer and Sources Policy.
Keep exploring
Related software
CMS
Contentful
Contentful describes itself as a Digital Experience Platform (DXP) using AI-driven analytics to help organizations manage, personalize, and optimize digital content across multiple channels and touchpoints.
CMS
Craft CMS
Craft CMS is a content-first content management system built by Pixel & Tonic that prioritizes flexible content modeling over predetermined structures, for both coupled and headless implementations.
CMS
Directus
Directus is a self-hostable, open-source headless CMS and backend that connects to any SQL database and instantly generates REST and GraphQL APIs plus a no-code admin interface.
Keep exploring
Related comparisons
Still not sure which one fits?
Answer a few questions and get a deterministic, explained match instead of comparing tool by tool.
Comparing something else?
Search any software by name to see its alternatives.